The US Empire v Venezuela: Chapter 2

Some more observations

  • The kidnapping of Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro and his wife solidifies America’s role as a gangster state. Violence does not generate peace. It generates violence. The immolation of international and humanitarian law generates a world without laws, a world of failed states, warlords, rouge imperial powers and perpetual violence and chaos.
  • Let’s strip away the euphemisms: this is invasion, not enforcement. There was no imminent threat to American soil that justified the use of force under international law.
  • [The understatement of the century] . . The abrupt removal of Maduro raises difficult issues.
  • [A statement of what we Brits call the bleedin’ obvious] The country’s future is unlikely to be plain sailing. 
  • The US record of interventions in Latin America and beyond does not bode well.
  • The milquetoast response from the UN and the EU suggests that neither knows how to handle the situation. 
  • Trump clearly does not care much about what allies and international bodies think of his conduct. But dismissing the rules-based order sets a precedent that he might regret.
  • Other authoritarian regimes will look at the events of the weekend with apprehension — none more so than Iran.
  • This year is only a few days old but no one can dispute that Trump has already reasserted himself as the dominant figure on the world stage. [Via the classic authoritarian move to distract from domestic problems – a ‘special operation non-war’.]

More questions arising

  • Is the next target really Colombia, as Trump has said? And then Canada??
  • Does Trump want to be emperor of all North and South America? [His ‘back garden’] ?
  • What next madness will be added to this one?
  • What will be the reaction of the US voters to all this? Can Trump’s approval rating fall even lower? Or will it now rise??
  • Will we all have a Happy New Year? Or just the demented US President, his crooked cronies and his mendacious, sycophantic acolytes?

3 comments

  1. I am reminded of the end of the 19th century, and how Latin America came under the aegis of the US through a new use of the Monroe Doctrine, cited by McFarty. The rules based world of diplomacy formed after the horrors of World War II is gone. It’s back to the spheres of influence of the late 19th century, that which brought us World War I.

    Like

  2. The US action in Venezuela is truly shocking. The only possible positive I can see is that it might make more folk aware of the true nature of the USA and it’s exploitive relationship with the rest of the world.

    After all, the USA’s treatment of Venezuela is nothing new or unique – it’s just more blatant and shameless! See for instance:

    https://williamblum.org/essays/read/overthrowing-other-peoples-governments-the-master-list

    Phil

    Like

Leave a comment